# Storage Fees improvements ( and few random ideas on the way ) **URL:** \ **Category:** Product & Ideas\ **Created:** [August 14, 2023, 11:59am UTC](https://forum.flow.com/t/storage-fees-improvements-and-few-random-ideas-on-the-way/5104 "2023-08-14T11:59:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 19
**Author:** ![AlexTheArchitect](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex022/user_avatar/forum.flow.com/alexthearchitect/32/1135_2.png) [@AlexTheArchitect](https://forum.flow.com/u/AlexTheArchitect)\ **Post date:** [September 1, 2023, 9:36pm UTC](https://forum.flow.com/t/storage-fees-improvements-and-few-random-ideas-on-the-way/5104/19 "2023-09-01T21:36:57Z")
Hey everyone, sorry it has been quiet from our end. It’s a technically complex area. Finding the time to engage at the necessary tech depth to move this exploratory discussion forward is right now a bit challenging. What you suggested is a really interesting and important avenue, which coincidentally could also solve some challenges in other areas. We really want to pursue this, though I would expect that us all together working through the details will take a decent amount of time. After all, overlooking important but subtle details might also have significant impact. Hence, my question: Would you be ok with the proposal in [FLIP 66 - Revisiting Flow storage minimum account balance](http://forum.flow.com/t/flip-66-revisiting-flow-storage-minimum-account-balance/4241) as an interim solution. Its not an ‘either one _or_ the other’ decision. I feel that implementing [FLIP 66](http://forum.flow.com/t/flip-66-revisiting-flow-storage-minimum-account-balance/4241) would give us the necessary time to work through more advanced proposals. Appreciate your thoughts, and thanks for your time and all your contributions ❤ --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.flow.com/t/storage-fees-improvements-and-few-random-ideas-on-the-way/5104)._